What Has Gone So Awry at Zipcar – Is the UK Car-Sharing Market Dead?
The community kitchen in Rotherhithe has provided a large number of prepared dishes each week for two years to elderly residents and needy locals in south London. Yet, the group's plans have been thrown into disarray by the announcement that they will not have use of New Year’s Day.
The group depended on Zipcar, the car-sharing company that customers to access its cars from the street. It caused shock across London when it declared it would shut down its UK operations from 1 January.
It will mean many volunteers cannot pick up supplies from a major food charity, which gathers surplus food from grocery stores, cafes and restaurants. Other options are less convenient, costlier, or do not offer the same convenient access.
“The impact will be massively,” stated Vimal Pandya, the community kitchen’s founder. “Personally me and my team are concerned by the operational hurdle we will face. Many groups like ours will face difficulties.”
“Faced with this reality, everyone is concerned and thinking: ‘How are we going to carry on?”
A Major Blow for Urban Car-Sharing
The community kitchen’s drivers are among over 500,000 people in London who were car club members, now potentially left without easy use to vehicles, without the hassle and cost of ownership. Most of those people were likely with Zipcar, which held a dominant position in the city.
The planned closure, subject to consultation with employees, is a serious setback to the vision that vehicle clubs in cities could reduce the need for private vehicle ownership. However, some analysts also suggested that Zipcar’s departure need not spell the end for the idea in Britain.
The Promise of Shared Mobility
Shared vehicle use is prized by many urbanists and environmentalists as a way of reducing the ills linked to vehicle ownership. Typically, vehicles sit as two-tonne dead weights on the side of the road for 95% of the time, using up space. They also require large CO2 output to produce, and people without a vehicle tend to use active travel and take transit more. That benefits cities – reducing congestion and pollution – and improves people’s health through increased activity.
Understanding the Decline
Zipcar was founded in 2000 before being bought by the American rental giant Avis Budget in 2013. Zipcar’s UK revenues were minimal compared with its owner's total earnings, and a loss that reached £11.7m in 2024 gave no reason to continue.
Avis Budget has said the closure is part of a “wider restructuring across our global operations, where we are taking deliberate steps to simplify processes, enhance profitability”.
Zipcar’s most recent accounts said revenues had declined as drivers took less frequent, shorter trips. “These changes reflect the ongoing impact of the cost-of-living crisis, which continues to suppress demand for non-essential services,” it said.
London's Unique Challenges
Yet, several experts noted that London has particular issues that made it much harder for the sector to succeed.
- Inconsistent Rules: With numerous local councils, car-club operators face a mosaic of different procedures and prices that complicate operations.
- Congestion Charge: The closure coincides with electric cars start paying London’s congestion charge, adding unavoidable costs.
- Parking Permit Disparity: Locals in some boroughs pay as little as £63 for a year’s electric car parking permit. A similar shared vehicle would pay over £1,100 annually, creating a significant barrier.
“We should literally be charged one-twentieth of a resident’s permit,” argued Robert Schopen of Co Wheels. “We’re taking cars off the street. We’re putting less polluting cars in their place.”
Lessons from Abroad
Other European countries offer examples for London to follow. Germany enacted national car-sharing legislation in 2017, providing a unified system for parking, support and waivers. Now, the country has 5.4 shared cars per 10,000 people, while France has 2.1 and Belgium has 6.3. The UK trails at 0.7.
“The evidence shows is that shared mobility around the world, particularly on the continent, is growing,” said Bharath Devanathan of Invers.
He suggested authorities should start to treat car sharing as a form of public transport, and integrate it with train and bus stations. He added that a potential operator was already seriously considering entering the London market: “There will be fill this gap.”
The Future Landscape
Other players can roughly be divided into two camps:
- Company-Owned Fleets: Which own or lease their own cars. This includes Denmark’s GreenMobility, France’s Free2Move, and Germany’s Miles Mobility.
- Peer-to-Peer Services: Which allow users to hire out their own vehicles via an app – a kind of Airbnb for cars. Players include Britain’s Hiyacar and the US’s Getaround and Turo.
Turo, a US-headquartered peer-to-peer platform, is already weighing up the UK gap. Rory Brimmer, its UK head, said there was a “significant chance” to win more users. “A space exists that is going to need to be filled, because London still needs to move,” Brimmer said.
However, it could take a while for other players to establish themselves. In the meantime, more people may feel forced to buy cars, and many across London will be left without access.
For the volunteers in Rotherhithe, the next month will be a scramble to find a way. The logistical challenge caused by Zipcar’s exit underscores the wider implications of its departure on vital services and the prospects of shared mobility in the UK.