🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."